Alejandro wrote:lather wrote:Alejandro wrote:For someone who wants others to reread what he's wrote, you're not to big on reading your own stuff, are you?
I don't need to reread it. I wrote it.
If you are going to accuse me of something, the onus is on you to prove it. If you are not going to prove it, admit your wrongdoing or at least sit quietly.
You DO need to reread it if you're going to go around telling people the same when you obviously didn't even remember what you wrote and instead decide to act like some wannabe intellectual douche.
I don't even know what this means. I'll try starting with a question.
How I
obviously don't remember what I wrote?
Alejandro wrote:You claim to not be dismissive and then go "Take it. Leave it. I really don't care",
I do not care. That is not dismissive. If I dismiss something, I reject it. I did not reject anything. I simply offered something that could be taken or not.
Alejandro wrote:you then assume that players would not know about something so blatantly obvious and act insulting when someone calls you on it only to backtrack and say "oh, I meant the characters, not the players"
I did not backtrack. As Rallan correctly observed, I made a typo.
Either road, players do not necessarily now this rule.
Even if they do, the player characters do not.
And that opens the door for in-game reason(s).
Alejandro wrote:even though you insist on acting like a chump.
Increasing the number of personal insults does nothing productive. Consider a change of tactic.
Alejandro wrote: You have consistently failed to bring anything to the table beyond weak insults and a house rule as a defense for your support of a stupid idea.
Quote my insults.
Quote my house rule.
Quote my stupid idea.