why no vf4?

Whether it is a Veritech or a Valkyrie, Robotech or Macross II, Earth is in danger eitherway. Grab your mecha and fight the good fight.

Moderators: Immortals, Supreme Beings, Old Ones

User avatar
taalismn
Priest
Posts: 48639
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:19 pm
Location: Somewhere between Heaven, Hell, and New England

Re: why no vf4?

Unread post by taalismn »

Its existance is hinted in in the production art, and an advanced version of it appears in the short Macross Memories piece(that isn't part of canon Robotech)...as such, the only time we see screentime of it in the edited Robotech is as a desktop model Rick is toying with, so it MIGHT exist (if as a regular, non-transformable, aircraft), but simply doesn't merit mention(prototype, short-lived interim vehicle, unrealized successor to the VF-1 because the program got vaporized in the Rain of Death) or simply a speculative flight of fancy that got realized as a toy/model...
I personally favor the developmental aircraft angle, with only a handful of prototypes produced before the program was shelved in favor of the Alpha configuration, and the VF-4 test aircraft going on to serve as test articles for the Super Century and Conbat series aircraft...
-------------
"Trouble rather the Tiger in his Lair,
Than the Sage among his Books,
For all the Empires and Kingdoms,
The Armies and Works that you hold Dear,
Are to him but the Playthings of the Moment,
To be turned over with the Flick of a Finger,
And the Turning of a Page"

--------Rudyard Kipling
------------
User avatar
tobefrnk
Adventurer
Posts: 458
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 11:58 am
Location: It's all about the gestalt.

Re: why no vf4?

Unread post by tobefrnk »

taalismn wrote:and the VF-4 test aircraft going on to serve as test articles for the Super Century and Conbat series aircraft...


It's rather nice and tidy that the VF-4 airframe has some similarity to the Conbat.
Image
User avatar
Colonel Wolfe
Knight
Posts: 4558
Joined: Sat May 15, 2004 11:37 pm
Comment: Poster's making baseless accusations of illegal actions go on the Foe list...
Location: Tampa FL
Contact:

Re: why no vf4?

Unread post by Colonel Wolfe »

i can dig them up, but Ricks hand is not located on the VF-4 while it is flying, Rick is ho;lding the model by its middle area, which was clearly veiwable while the vf-4 was flying, and no hand was present holding it in the air.
Give another Gamer a hand up with his education.
"By no means am I an expert on Southern Cross (I cordially detest the series)"-Seto
"Truth is determined by the evidence, not some nonexistent seniority system."-Seto
Image
User avatar
taalismn
Priest
Posts: 48639
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:19 pm
Location: Somewhere between Heaven, Hell, and New England

Re: why no vf4?

Unread post by taalismn »

Colonel Wolfe wrote:i can dig them up, but Ricks hand is not located on the VF-4 while it is flying, Rick is ho;lding the model by its middle area, which was clearly veiwable while the vf-4 was flying, and no hand was present holding it in the air.


We don't see it flying during the TV series, only in the Macross short..
The Macross Memories uber-bible has a sketch of an interim VF-4 design between the one we see in the TV series and the Macross music video, that looks more like parts of a VF-1 and the super-FAST packs arranged differently, being tested in the missing time between 'Force of Arms' and 'Reconstruction BLues', though it's not certain if that's supposed to be a VF-4 development(or REdevelopment), or an alternate design line...
As for its similarites to the Conbat...well, you look at the SR-71 and the British supersonic testbeds, and you see the lineage of twin-engined SS aircraft right there...
-------------
"Trouble rather the Tiger in his Lair,
Than the Sage among his Books,
For all the Empires and Kingdoms,
The Armies and Works that you hold Dear,
Are to him but the Playthings of the Moment,
To be turned over with the Flick of a Finger,
And the Turning of a Page"

--------Rudyard Kipling
------------
User avatar
drewkitty ~..~
Monk
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2000 1:01 am
Location: Eastvale, calif
Contact:

Re: why no vf4?

Unread post by drewkitty ~..~ »

The only time the VF-4 Lighting III was animated in a show was in the "Flashback 2012" in the SDF-2 Megaroad-01 Launching animation.

Therefor, since it was not in the macross TV series it was not a part of the licensing agreement that let HG make RT.
May you be blessed with the ability to change course when you are off the mark.
Each question should be give the canon answer 1st, then you can proclaim your house rules.
Reading and writing (literacy) is how people on BBS interact.
User avatar
Colonel Wolfe
Knight
Posts: 4558
Joined: Sat May 15, 2004 11:37 pm
Comment: Poster's making baseless accusations of illegal actions go on the Foe list...
Location: Tampa FL
Contact:

Re: why no vf4?

Unread post by Colonel Wolfe »

taalismn wrote:
Colonel Wolfe wrote:i can dig them up, but Ricks hand is not located on the VF-4 while it is flying, Rick is ho;lding the model by its middle area, which was clearly veiwable while the vf-4 was flying, and no hand was present holding it in the air.


We don't see it flying during the TV series, only in the Macross short..

http://www.robotech.com/images/content/MEC_60_2_167.jpg
Here is a still image opf the Yf-4 in flight.
and note no fingers holding it:

http://www.robotech.com/images/content/ ... 3_8109.gif

and note where Ricks fingers are in this image.

And HG seams to think they have some Claim to its existance as something beyond a model:
http://www.robotech.com/infopedia/mecha ... .php?id=60

FIGHTER MODE
Length: 13.4 m
Height: 3.2 m
Wingspan: 11.91 m
Max speed at sea level: Mach 1.21
Max speed at 30,000m: Mach 4.18

I dont think Ricks Model is 13.4 METERS in lenght.
Give another Gamer a hand up with his education.
"By no means am I an expert on Southern Cross (I cordially detest the series)"-Seto
"Truth is determined by the evidence, not some nonexistent seniority system."-Seto
Image
User avatar
taalismn
Priest
Posts: 48639
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:19 pm
Location: Somewhere between Heaven, Hell, and New England

Re: why no vf4?

Unread post by taalismn »

What episode did the first shot appear in?

As for the rest....Cross your fingers and hope for a 'Strike Force II: Secrets of Robotechnology' supplement...
-------------
"Trouble rather the Tiger in his Lair,
Than the Sage among his Books,
For all the Empires and Kingdoms,
The Armies and Works that you hold Dear,
Are to him but the Playthings of the Moment,
To be turned over with the Flick of a Finger,
And the Turning of a Page"

--------Rudyard Kipling
------------
Chris0013
Hero
Posts: 906
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 4:20 pm

Re: why no vf4?

Unread post by Chris0013 »

If they did not have any rights to it I do not think it would have shown up in From The Stars.....I think they have rights to the jet mode but the Battloid / Guardian only showed up in a video game and they did not have rights to those designs.
I know it is a little extreme to advocate the death penalty for stupidity...but can't we just remove all the warning labels and let nature take it's course???
User avatar
Tiree
Champion
Posts: 2603
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2001 2:01 am
Comment: Token Right Wing Fascist Totalitarian
"Never hit a man while he's down. Kick them, it's easier" - The Hunt
Location: 25th Member of the "Cabal of 24"
Contact:

Re: why no vf4?

Unread post by Tiree »

Chris0013 wrote:If they did not have any rights to it I do not think it would have shown up in From The Stars.....I think they have rights to the jet mode but the Battloid / Guardian only showed up in a video game and they did not have rights to those designs.

That's exactly how I understand it. - HG only has rights to the Jet Fighter mode, not the Battloid Mode. If they designed a new Battloid version, then they would have something 'New' and thus have something. The same can be said for the transforming Condor. There is no image proof, and thus there is no RPG Material stating it should. Other than a design note saying there is an experimental version.
User avatar
Colonel Wolfe
Knight
Posts: 4558
Joined: Sat May 15, 2004 11:37 pm
Comment: Poster's making baseless accusations of illegal actions go on the Foe list...
Location: Tampa FL
Contact:

Re: why no vf4?

Unread post by Colonel Wolfe »

taalismn wrote:What episode did the first shot appear in?

As for the rest....Cross your fingers and hope for a 'Strike Force II: Secrets of Robotechnology' supplement...
First Appearance:
Episode 36 - "To the Stars"
Give another Gamer a hand up with his education.
"By no means am I an expert on Southern Cross (I cordially detest the series)"-Seto
"Truth is determined by the evidence, not some nonexistent seniority system."-Seto
Image
User avatar
taalismn
Priest
Posts: 48639
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:19 pm
Location: Somewhere between Heaven, Hell, and New England

Re: why no vf4?

Unread post by taalismn »

Robot Urchin wrote:
gelgoog wrote:DYRL as a model. (i don't remember in the heavly cut robotech version of DYRL)


You mean Clash of the Bionoids from Celebrity Home Video's world-famous* Just-For-Kids collection?

I was pretty surprised to see the VF-4 in DYRL. It looks like Misa was surprised too.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3628/345 ... 21.jpg?v=0


Oh, it has a different color scheme than the TV series version, so this one can't be used in the Robotech RPG. :D


*=> (not really)


Also a much sharper, more angular design...virtually a different craft...
-------------
"Trouble rather the Tiger in his Lair,
Than the Sage among his Books,
For all the Empires and Kingdoms,
The Armies and Works that you hold Dear,
Are to him but the Playthings of the Moment,
To be turned over with the Flick of a Finger,
And the Turning of a Page"

--------Rudyard Kipling
------------
User avatar
Beatmeclever
Adventurer
Posts: 560
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 3:09 am
Location: Mile High, USA

Re: why no vf4?

Unread post by Beatmeclever »

Khyron_Prime wrote:I'm not allowed to post stats or anything Palladium-related on the Palladium boards, so I'll just stick with outright hypothetical discussion, for now:

Hypothetically speaking, what if someone (who may or may not be me) had a diagram of a generic fighter plane which outlines how if, hypothetically speaking, the wings, thrusters, engine area, and nosecone realigned themselves and moved, hypothetically speaking, into a humanoid form, thus giving the prodigious game master the opportunity to and tools required to, hypothetically speaking, turn any fighter plane of his choice from an F-4 to a MiG-29 or F-22 or, hypothetically speaking, a fictional fighter plane, into a humanoid re-configuration?

Were this to exist, the prodigious game masters, never content with awaiting a book to tell them how to run their games, could proceed and, hypothetically speaking, use their imagination to have any fighter plane, regardless of design, become a humanoid combat machine which, hypothetically speaking, would resemble the kinds seen in various cartoons designed during the 1980s.

If that happened, hypothetically speaking, would there continue to be answerless debates such as this one?


If something like that were to exist, hypothetically of course, I'd have to ask, "Can you PM that to me?" I love to, hypothetically, see something like that.
"The impossibility of the world lies in the fact that it has no equivalent anywhere;it cannot be exchanged for anything. The uncertainty of thought lies in the fact that it cannot be exchanged either for truth or for reality. Is it thought which tips the world over into uncertainty, or the other way around? This in itself is part of the uncertainty." - J. Baudrillard
Chris0013
Hero
Posts: 906
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 4:20 pm

Re: why no vf4?

Unread post by Chris0013 »

Beatmeclever wrote:
Khyron_Prime wrote:I'm not allowed to post stats or anything Palladium-related on the Palladium boards, so I'll just stick with outright hypothetical discussion, for now:

Hypothetically speaking, what if someone (who may or may not be me) had a diagram of a generic fighter plane which outlines how if, hypothetically speaking, the wings, thrusters, engine area, and nosecone realigned themselves and moved, hypothetically speaking, into a humanoid form, thus giving the prodigious game master the opportunity to and tools required to, hypothetically speaking, turn any fighter plane of his choice from an F-4 to a MiG-29 or F-22 or, hypothetically speaking, a fictional fighter plane, into a humanoid re-configuration?

Were this to exist, the prodigious game masters, never content with awaiting a book to tell them how to run their games, could proceed and, hypothetically speaking, use their imagination to have any fighter plane, regardless of design, become a humanoid combat machine which, hypothetically speaking, would resemble the kinds seen in various cartoons designed during the 1980s.

If that happened, hypothetically speaking, would there continue to be answerless debates such as this one?


If something like that were to exist, hypothetically of course, I'd have to ask, "Can you PM that to me?" I love to, hypothetically, see something like that.


I might hypothetically want one PM'ed to me too...
I know it is a little extreme to advocate the death penalty for stupidity...but can't we just remove all the warning labels and let nature take it's course???
User avatar
tobefrnk
Adventurer
Posts: 458
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 11:58 am
Location: It's all about the gestalt.

Re: why no vf4?

Unread post by tobefrnk »

CavScout wrote:There is no rule against posting images of alternative modes for vehicles is there?


I don't think so. As long as you don't post RPG stats. If this is not the case, then a number of our signatures would be suspect. :wink:
Image
User avatar
taalismn
Priest
Posts: 48639
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:19 pm
Location: Somewhere between Heaven, Hell, and New England

Re: why no vf4?

Unread post by taalismn »

..Enough art that it shows up on fan-art size comparison charts...
Frankly, though, I think the VF4 battloid mode looks rather gangly and crude compared to the classic VF-1...so probably the only real improvement was in the speed and range of the fighter mode...
-------------
"Trouble rather the Tiger in his Lair,
Than the Sage among his Books,
For all the Empires and Kingdoms,
The Armies and Works that you hold Dear,
Are to him but the Playthings of the Moment,
To be turned over with the Flick of a Finger,
And the Turning of a Page"

--------Rudyard Kipling
------------
User avatar
tobefrnk
Adventurer
Posts: 458
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 11:58 am
Location: It's all about the gestalt.

Re: why no vf4?

Unread post by tobefrnk »

taalismn wrote:..Enough art that it shows up on fan-art size comparison charts...
Frankly, though, I think the VF4 battloid mode looks rather gangly and crude compared to the classic VF-1...so probably the only real improvement was in the speed and range of the fighter mode...


Yeah, I have never liked the look of the battloid mode of the VF4 and the whole semi-recessed missile launchers are quirky too.
Image
User avatar
Jefffar
Supreme Being
Posts: 8698
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2000 1:01 am
Comment: Being a moderator doesn't mean I speak for Palladium Books. It just makes me the lifeguard at their pool.
Location: Unreality
Contact:

Re: why no vf4?

Unread post by Jefffar »

The VF-4 does exist within the RPG. It's mentioned that the VF-4 program was cancelled before the VF-4 entered production.

This is in line with what the Infopedia article that Col. Wolfe linked to states.
Official Hero of the Megaverse

Dead Boy wrote:All hail Jefffar... King of the Mods

Co-Holder with Ice Dragon of the "Lando Calrissian" award for Smooth. - Novastar

Palladium Forums of the Megaverse Rules

If you need to contact Palladium Books for any reason, click here.
User avatar
Chris
Explorer
Posts: 144
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 1:32 am
Location: Irvine: CA

Re: why no vf4?

Unread post by Chris »

Robot Urchin wrote:
gelgoog wrote:DYRL as a model. (i don't remember in the heavly cut robotech version of DYRL)


You mean Clash of the Bionoids from Celebrity Home Video's world-famous* Just-For-Kids collection?

I was pretty surprised to see the VF-4 in DYRL. It looks like Misa was surprised too.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3628/345 ... 21.jpg?v=0


Oh, it has a different color scheme than the TV series version, so this one can't be used in the Robotech RPG. :D


*=> (not really)


Did you notice the Easter egg in that picture?

Look at the model plane NEXT to the VF-4...



It's an XB-70 Valkyrie ^_^
User avatar
taalismn
Priest
Posts: 48639
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:19 pm
Location: Somewhere between Heaven, Hell, and New England

Re: why no vf4?

Unread post by taalismn »

Chris wrote:
Robot Urchin wrote:
gelgoog wrote:DYRL as a model. (i don't remember in the heavly cut robotech version of DYRL)


You mean Clash of the Bionoids from Celebrity Home Video's world-famous* Just-For-Kids collection?

I was pretty surprised to see the VF-4 in DYRL. It looks like Misa was surprised too.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3628/345 ... 21.jpg?v=0


Oh, it has a different color scheme than the TV series version, so this one can't be used in the Robotech RPG. :D

GREAT call there...


*=> (not really)


Did you notice the Easter egg in that picture?

Look at the model plane NEXT to the VF-4...



It's an XB-70 Valkyrie ^_^


Great call, there.
-------------
"Trouble rather the Tiger in his Lair,
Than the Sage among his Books,
For all the Empires and Kingdoms,
The Armies and Works that you hold Dear,
Are to him but the Playthings of the Moment,
To be turned over with the Flick of a Finger,
And the Turning of a Page"

--------Rudyard Kipling
------------
User avatar
Chris
Explorer
Posts: 144
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 1:32 am
Location: Irvine: CA

Re: why no vf4?

Unread post by Chris »

taalismn wrote:
Great call, there.


Thank you ^_^
Locked

Return to “Robotech® - The Shadow Chronicles® - Macross II®”