Who like Gol-borgs? I do!
Moderators: Immortals, Supreme Beings, Old Ones
- Captain Shiva
- Adventurer
- Posts: 771
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 11:44 am
- Comment: In sheer daemonic strangeness I am unparalleled
- Contact:
Re: Who like Gol-borgs? I do!
How about silver Gol-Limbs that shoot blasts of water?
Have you ever been thrown out of a Rifts game for being smarter than the Game Master?
- Lord Z
- Hero
- Posts: 1513
- Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 12:53 am
- Comment: Court of Tarot author
- Location: Saint Augustine, FL, U.S.A.
Re: Who like Gol-borgs? I do!
There is certainly precedent for such things. The Seduced Technowizard O.C.C. from Rifter #2 comes immediately to mind.
I am concerned. There are already means for replacing missing limbs and organs magically, such as Ley Line Regeneration from Siege on Tolkeen Book #1. What is bothersome to me about this system is that the replacements are better than the originals. Other than a period of adjustment, there is no reason for a spellcaster to not start hacking off her own limbs. When you remove one of the shortcomings inherent to the magic system, magic gets that much more attractive. Magic already greatly outpaces technology at the higher ends (by which I mean 15th level characters, large monsters, godlings and such). I'm hard pressed to think of a reason why anyone would go the technology route rather than being a spellslinger or techno-wizard. By using the Gol-limbs, magic also makes a better partial-conversion borg.
It's a valid concept, but I feel that it needs work. I voted, "Meh."
I am concerned. There are already means for replacing missing limbs and organs magically, such as Ley Line Regeneration from Siege on Tolkeen Book #1. What is bothersome to me about this system is that the replacements are better than the originals. Other than a period of adjustment, there is no reason for a spellcaster to not start hacking off her own limbs. When you remove one of the shortcomings inherent to the magic system, magic gets that much more attractive. Magic already greatly outpaces technology at the higher ends (by which I mean 15th level characters, large monsters, godlings and such). I'm hard pressed to think of a reason why anyone would go the technology route rather than being a spellslinger or techno-wizard. By using the Gol-limbs, magic also makes a better partial-conversion borg.
It's a valid concept, but I feel that it needs work. I voted, "Meh."
Currently recruiting for Beyond the Supernatural games in 2019 which I am running on Discord: voice, text, and play-by-post. Here is the non-expiring server invite link: 418BQSLG
“All would be well. All would be heavenly— If the damned would only stay damned.”
-- Charles Fort, The Book of the Damned, 1913
“All would be well. All would be heavenly— If the damned would only stay damned.”
-- Charles Fort, The Book of the Damned, 1913
- grandmaster z0b
- Champion
- Posts: 3005
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 1:44 am
- Location: Tech-City of Melbourne
- Contact:
Re: Who like Gol-borgs? I do!
Well, I like the concept and I don't think that magic users are going to start hacking off limbs willy nilly if you make sure it's a rare ritual that very few mages know and as the PPE requirement is high enough to deter low level characters.
However I will point out that there are other ways to replace limbs for magic users.
Firstly, I don't think that bio-systems do have any draw back to PPE or spell casting.
Secondly, bio-wizards can attach limbs which are better than the original and do not reduce spell casting or PPE. Of course dealing with bio-wizards is expensive and comes with it's own dangers.
However I will point out that there are other ways to replace limbs for magic users.
Firstly, I don't think that bio-systems do have any draw back to PPE or spell casting.
Secondly, bio-wizards can attach limbs which are better than the original and do not reduce spell casting or PPE. Of course dealing with bio-wizards is expensive and comes with it's own dangers.
The word "THAN" is important. Something is "better than" something else, not "better then", it's "rather than" not "rather then".