Kryptt wrote:The first part is why I'm upset with PB/nd. I had some soda pop minis from one of their game lines. Their miniatures look like they stepped right out of of an anime. So I kinda was expecting bandai quality. Talk about egg on my face.lol
I wasn't all that impressed by what I saw on their website... it seemed more typical of the stuff that we see when American movies and TV shows try to throw mecha in. Big clunky egg-shaped walker with an anemic looking set of limbs. They look like those boring mecha from
Avatar.
Kryptt wrote:For the second now I now better. So either I don't back the next one or go in for only $20 instead. I'm not a fan of southern cross but this game will need other factions for it to survive.
Well, I think a big part of the problem there has nothing to do with backers (directly)... the other 2/3 of
Robotech are not remembered nearly as fondly (or, often, not remembered at all) as
Macross. They opened with their strongest lineup, and it's all downhill from there. Especially considering that the other two's mecha merchandise are, according to other licensees, "not worth even trying" and "an abysmal failure" respectively.
(I actually consider the failure of the
MOSPEADA based merch tragic, since I rather like that show and its designs.)
Larry A wrote:Give it up, they are deliberately ignoring anything that doesn't fit the "you invested, you are stupid, this is like real investments in the markets, so shut up and don't try to get your money back like any good little Palladium drone".
Actually, that's not true. I've repeatedly acknowledged that the backers have a right to be upset given that the project they backed has not, thus far, produced satisfactory results. I take exception to them claiming victim status for a variety of reasons, including, but not limited to, the fact that the backing of Robotech RPG Tactics WAS an investment and a good investor is always aware of the risks involved and the possibility of failure. I haven't said anyone was stupid for investing in the game... though I'll admit I
have said that blindly throwing money at a proposal isn't especially wise or clever, and loses you a right to sympathy when the result is exactly what anyone who looked into the respective track records from the parties involved would expect.
If the backers want their money back as an expression of their discontent, I say give it to them. Since they're owed merchandise, it's not like they're unsecured creditors. The problem with that is that you'd have to prove the issues with the game are their fault and demonstrate that they've not delivered what they promised... and that's a very tall order when the complaint is quality-based, and the timeline issues may not actually be their fault.