Paired weapons question

1st edition? 2nd edition? It doesnt matter! Let's just talk Palladium Fantasy.

Moderators: Immortals, Supreme Beings, Old Ones

User avatar
Soldier of Od
Hero
Posts: 1027
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 10:32 am
Location: Great Britain

Paired weapons question

Unread post by Soldier of Od »

A complicated subject, I know. But this question isn't specifically about how the paired weapons skill works -

What I want to know is this: do you think one needs the paired weapons skill in order to use a weapon in each hand, even if each weapon is being used separately? So (ignoring all the possible paired weapons manoeuvres), imagine I have a sword in one hand that is +2 to parry and an axe in the other hand that does way more damage than the sword, so in combat I want to use the axe for hitting and the sword for parrying. Do I need to know the paired weapons skill in order to be able to wield weapons in both hands in this way? Or can I just do it regardless of skill?

I am inclined to say that the paired weapons skill is required, in order to learn how to use a weapon in one's "off-hand" at all, (which is otherwise not covered anywhere) and to learn how to cope with swinging two weapons around without one move adversely affecting the other. What do you guys think?
Rifter Contributor:
Rifter 61 – Purebred animal templates for Mutants in Avalon (After the Bomb)
Rifter 77 & 78 – Khemennu, City of the Eighteen Cosmic Gods (Palladium Fantasy)
Rifter 83 – The Prophet O.C.C. (Palladium Fantasy)
Rifter 83 – Half-Ogres (Palladium Fantasy)
Rifter 84 – Spellbound O.C.C. (Nightbane)
Rifter 85 – Relics of Empire: Elven Cities of the Old Kingdom (Palladium Fantasy)
User avatar
Hotrod
Knight
Posts: 3445
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2001 1:01 am
Location: Orion Arm, Milky Way Galaxy

Re: Paired weapons question

Unread post by Hotrod »

I'd say it is required. Just switching from fighting with one hand to another is difficult unless you've trained for it.
Hotrod
Author, Rifter Contributor, and Map Artist
Duty's Edge, a Rifts novel. Available as an ebook, PDF,or printed book.
Check out my maps here!
Also, check out my Instant NPC Generators!
Like what you see? There's more on my Patreon Page.
Image
User avatar
Kraynic
Dungeon Crawler
Posts: 339
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2019 4:01 pm
Location: Montana

Re: Paired weapons question

Unread post by Kraynic »

Do you require paired weapons for someone using a one handed weapon and a shield? I don't require paired weapons if the second weapon is there as added defense or a backup weapon if something happens to the first (like a parrying dagger, or something to throw while still retaining the main melee weapon), but I do still require it to counter the moves that someone with the skill can perform.
User avatar
kiralon
Champion
Posts: 2842
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 10:05 pm
Comment: Kill it with Fire.

Re: Paired weapons question

Unread post by kiralon »

If you use them both in the same round yes. I would say you could carry one and use the other, and swap which one is being used at the start of the round, but I would also give negatives for the off hand.
User avatar
Veknironth
Hero
Posts: 1560
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2000 1:01 am
Location: Bowie, MD USA
Contact:

Re: Paired weapons question

Unread post by Veknironth »

Well, I have only a small amount of experience using a shield but I think it's pretty intuitive. The whole idea of a shield is that you can easily block with it, even if you don't have a lot of training. And the bigger the shield, the easier it is to use (assuming you have the requisite strength). For another weapon, that's a much greater level of skill. You have to manipulate the weapon to a much greater degree, so it requires the Paired Weapons skill.

-Vek
"You're probably better off with two hands on the single weapon than one in each, if you aren't practiced in using two weapons simultaneously."
User avatar
kiralon
Champion
Posts: 2842
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 10:05 pm
Comment: Kill it with Fire.

Re: Paired weapons question

Unread post by kiralon »

Veknironth wrote:Well, I have only a small amount of experience using a shield but I think it's pretty intuitive. The whole idea of a shield is that you can easily block with it, even if you don't have a lot of training. And the bigger the shield, the easier it is to use (assuming you have the requisite strength). For another weapon, that's a much greater level of skill. You have to manipulate the weapon to a much greater degree, so it requires the Paired Weapons skill.

-Vek
"You're probably better off with two hands on the single weapon than one in each, if you aren't practiced in using two weapons simultaneously."

+1
And wp shield comes with the training to use the shield and sword in combat at the same time so you don't need paired weapons wp to do so (says in description)
Colonel_Tetsuya
Champion
Posts: 2172
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 3:22 am

Re: Paired weapons question

Unread post by Colonel_Tetsuya »

Hotrod wrote:I'd say it is required. Just switching from fighting with one hand to another is difficult unless you've trained for it.


Nearly impossible.

Im right-handed. If im forced to fight left-handed, i handily get my butt kicked by people who aren't at a similar disadvantage, even if i usually beat them easily.
Im loving the Foes list; it's the only thing keeping me from tearing out my eyes from the dumb.
User avatar
Soldier of Od
Hero
Posts: 1027
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 10:32 am
Location: Great Britain

Re: Paired weapons question

Unread post by Soldier of Od »

Hi guys,
Thank you very much for all of your input. Much appreciated!
Rifter Contributor:
Rifter 61 – Purebred animal templates for Mutants in Avalon (After the Bomb)
Rifter 77 & 78 – Khemennu, City of the Eighteen Cosmic Gods (Palladium Fantasy)
Rifter 83 – The Prophet O.C.C. (Palladium Fantasy)
Rifter 83 – Half-Ogres (Palladium Fantasy)
Rifter 84 – Spellbound O.C.C. (Nightbane)
Rifter 85 – Relics of Empire: Elven Cities of the Old Kingdom (Palladium Fantasy)
User avatar
The Beast
Demon Lord Extraordinaire
Posts: 5959
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 3:28 pm
Comment: You probably think this comment is about you, don't you?
Location: Apocrypha

Re: Paired weapons question

Unread post by The Beast »

Soldier of Od wrote:A complicated subject, I know. But this question isn't specifically about how the paired weapons skill works -

What I want to know is this: do you think one needs the paired weapons skill in order to use a weapon in each hand, even if each weapon is being used separately? So (ignoring all the possible paired weapons manoeuvres), imagine I have a sword in one hand that is +2 to parry and an axe in the other hand that does way more damage than the sword, so in combat I want to use the axe for hitting and the sword for parrying. Do I need to know the paired weapons skill in order to be able to wield weapons in both hands in this way? Or can I just do it regardless of skill?

I am inclined to say that the paired weapons skill is required, in order to learn how to use a weapon in one's "off-hand" at all, (which is otherwise not covered anywhere) and to learn how to cope with swinging two weapons around without one move adversely affecting the other. What do you guys think?


Yeah, you'd need the skill for this.

-M'aiq
"Don't try blocking if you have two weapons. You will only get confused. Much better to hit twice anyway."
User avatar
malaclypse
D-Bee
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2018 5:20 pm

Re: Paired weapons question

Unread post by malaclypse »

I wouldn't require it, but I'd give fugly penalties if you don't have it.
User avatar
drewkitty ~..~
Monk
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2000 1:01 am
Location: Eastvale, calif
Contact:

Re: Paired weapons question

Unread post by drewkitty ~..~ »

To use the weapons in the same APM round the char needs to have paired weapons to use both.

If using one or the other in different APM rounds the char can use one in each hand, with noted off hand penilties for the weapon in the off hand.
May you be blessed with the ability to change course when you are off the mark.
Each question should be give the canon answer 1st, then you can proclaim your house rules.
Reading and writing (literacy) is how people on BBS interact.
User avatar
Lukterran
Adventurer
Posts: 642
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 2:01 am
Location: The Kingdom of Farr

Re: Paired weapons question

Unread post by Lukterran »

I would listen to Vek - "He knows his MFing Paired Weapons"
User avatar
Veknironth
Hero
Posts: 1560
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2000 1:01 am
Location: Bowie, MD USA
Contact:

Re: Paired weapons question

Unread post by Veknironth »

Well, look at Lukterran bringing back one of my old hits. Does anyone know the story of that quote?

-Vek
"Other than me, obviously."
User avatar
drewkitty ~..~
Monk
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2000 1:01 am
Location: Eastvale, calif
Contact:

Re: Paired weapons question

Unread post by drewkitty ~..~ »

The question from me is, why only one person answered the OP question with what the PB game system rules says?
May you be blessed with the ability to change course when you are off the mark.
Each question should be give the canon answer 1st, then you can proclaim your house rules.
Reading and writing (literacy) is how people on BBS interact.
User avatar
malaclypse
D-Bee
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2018 5:20 pm

Re: Paired weapons question

Unread post by malaclypse »

drewkitty ~..~ wrote:The question from me is, why only one person answered the OP question with what the PB game system rules says?


Might be because the OP didn't ask for the game rule answer.

OP wrote:do you think
User avatar
RockJock
Knight
Posts: 3805
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 2:01 am
Location: Nashville.....ish....

Re: Paired weapons question

Unread post by RockJock »

We always read it like this. The sword and shield wielder without paired weapons, but with with wp sword and wp shield could use both, but would not get an auto parry. So basically an attack is burned to use the shield to parry.

This is just what made sense to us.
RockJock, holder of the mighty Rune Rock Hammer!
User avatar
drewkitty ~..~
Monk
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2000 1:01 am
Location: Eastvale, calif
Contact:

Re: Paired weapons question

Unread post by drewkitty ~..~ »

malaclypse wrote:
drewkitty ~..~ wrote:The question from me is, why only one person answered the OP question with what the PB game system rules says?


Might be because the OP didn't ask for the game rule answer.

What I read was that he first said he wasn't asking about a pairing weapons in the same APM and then asked exactly what he just said he wasn't going to be asking about.
...so in combat I want to use the axe for hitting and the sword for parrying. Do I need to know the paired weapons skill in order to be able to wield weapons in both hands in this way? Or can I just do it regardless of skill?

Therfore, it needed a rules answer.
May you be blessed with the ability to change course when you are off the mark.
Each question should be give the canon answer 1st, then you can proclaim your house rules.
Reading and writing (literacy) is how people on BBS interact.
Colonel_Tetsuya
Champion
Posts: 2172
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 3:22 am

Re: Paired weapons question

Unread post by Colonel_Tetsuya »

RockJock wrote:We always read it like this. The sword and shield wielder without paired weapons, but with with wp sword and wp shield could use both, but would not get an auto parry. So basically an attack is burned to use the shield to parry.

This is just what made sense to us.


.... im not sure how this makes sense, really.

Even when you have the proficiency to use the shield, you cant use the shield? Thats... nonsensical.

Training with a shield includes using it with a weapon. There is no case of "i just use a shield".
Im loving the Foes list; it's the only thing keeping me from tearing out my eyes from the dumb.
User avatar
drewkitty ~..~
Monk
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2000 1:01 am
Location: Eastvale, calif
Contact:

Re: Paired weapons question

Unread post by drewkitty ~..~ »

RockJock wrote:We always read it like this. The sword and shield wielder without paired weapons, but with with wp sword and wp shield could use both, but would not get an auto parry. So basically an attack is burned to use the shield to parry.

This is just what made sense to us.

To parry with a 2nd, off hand weapon, w/o the PW WP burns the Next APM. (Like dodging does.) So the above is only saying the char just can't parry with a 2nd-off hand-weapon if they don't have both weapons' WPs. Interesting house rule. A bit anti-munchiny, in stead of the the norm.
May you be blessed with the ability to change course when you are off the mark.
Each question should be give the canon answer 1st, then you can proclaim your house rules.
Reading and writing (literacy) is how people on BBS interact.
Post Reply

Return to “Palladium Fantasy RPG®”