destroyed, the armor would no longer exist. Spells need to have a
duration for the Ward to work. I believe one of the Rifters recently
clarified this up. Someone help me on this.
enchanting....
Moderators: Immortals, Supreme Beings, Old Ones
-
Reagren Wright
- Palladium Books® Freelance Writer
- Posts: 3240
- Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2002 2:01 am
- Comment: The greatest part of the writer's time is spent in reading, in order to write: a man will turn over half a library to make one book. - Samuel Johnson, 1775
- Location: LaPorte, In USA
Re: enchanting....
Damob wrote:What would happen if a player would cast armor of ithan to a clothing and then place permanence ward on it?
The clothing would have the armor of ithan until the cothing or the ward was destroyed (I'm pretty sure about this, Madmanmike can you help us on this one?).
Snoopy and Charlie Brown are (c) Peanuts Worldwide.
"Besser ein Ende mit Schrecken als ein Schrecken ohne Ende." ( A frightening end is better than an endless fright) -- Nelly
You called down the thunder, well now you got it!
Oh what A tangled web we weave ...
"Besser ein Ende mit Schrecken als ein Schrecken ohne Ende." ( A frightening end is better than an endless fright) -- Nelly
You called down the thunder, well now you got it!
Oh what A tangled web we weave ...
thekk wrote:Uhm, in the main rule book, it says the range is "self or other", meaning other person. Meaning that you can't cast armor of Ithan on clothing, only on persons.
Then the tricky part, I (as a GM) wouldn't allow a permanence ward to be painted on .... yeah, on what actually? A spell, probably.
If you do it as a ward you can. In games I've put immobilize on a person/his clothes and then slapped a permanence ward to keep him where I wanted him forever. In fact he's still there (we never removed it)
Snoopy and Charlie Brown are (c) Peanuts Worldwide.
"Besser ein Ende mit Schrecken als ein Schrecken ohne Ende." ( A frightening end is better than an endless fright) -- Nelly
You called down the thunder, well now you got it!
Oh what A tangled web we weave ...
"Besser ein Ende mit Schrecken als ein Schrecken ohne Ende." ( A frightening end is better than an endless fright) -- Nelly
You called down the thunder, well now you got it!
Oh what A tangled web we weave ...
Thekk wrote:I stand corrected.
But then you have a problem affixing the ward: it has to be sewn into the persons skin... Would the diabolist creating the ward have to make an attackroll each time he tries to put the needle into the skin?
I know thats the nasty part. Kinda hurts
Snoopy and Charlie Brown are (c) Peanuts Worldwide.
"Besser ein Ende mit Schrecken als ein Schrecken ohne Ende." ( A frightening end is better than an endless fright) -- Nelly
You called down the thunder, well now you got it!
Oh what A tangled web we weave ...
"Besser ein Ende mit Schrecken als ein Schrecken ohne Ende." ( A frightening end is better than an endless fright) -- Nelly
You called down the thunder, well now you got it!
Oh what A tangled web we weave ...
Rifter #25 contains an answer about permanence ward and spells in its Q&A section. I believe it addresses the Armor of Ithan question as in it can be done. However, the AoI can still be rendered to 0 SDC and thus inoperable.
As for affixing the ward, its my opinion that the ward affixation occurs before the spell is cast. Then, the Diabolist activates the ward before the spell duration ends.
As for affixing the ward, its my opinion that the ward affixation occurs before the spell is cast. Then, the Diabolist activates the ward before the spell duration ends.