ShadowLogan wrote:Not really obtuse. And the Plot can make sense. Remember they call the PC-users addicts, so they might think these people are abusing/using PC in an unhealthy manner and can't be saved (or this is the only way to "save" them). They may only think of themselves as non-addicts.
Again, that's simply not consistent with their expressed desire to annihilate protoculture-using races, or their efforts to wipe out protoculture itself... why would they be going to such great pains to annihilate the last source of the stuff in the universe if they themselves depend on it?
ShadowLogan wrote:No it is correct. The Definition of RTnology in the AotSC states it was developed not invented.
Synonyms... a mystery to you? They do refer to these as being Zor's inventions in his bio. The creation of new technology is called development... that's why the groups in corporations tasked with scientific study and practical application of those new principles they discover "Research and Development". The process of creating new technologies is called "development".
It still establishes that Zor and the Tirolians were the first ones to develop (create) robotechnology... and, fittingly enough, none of the powers in RT except humanity and the Tirolians are ever identified as using robotechnology.
ShadowLogan wrote:I know they ascribe to being quite old (and lost). Shadow Technology offers no known benefit when fighting the Invid if you don't use PC.
You're making a few assumptions here... the first being that the Haydonites developed the shadow field to fight against the Invid, and the second being that the Invid have always had protoculture sensors. Considering how small a portion of what shadow fields are used to insulate against is actually protoculture emissions, and that the technological applications of the Invid Flowers of Life were discovered by Zor, the "father of protoculture" (per his bio), that the shadow field was developed with a mind towards shielding against Invid protoculture sensors is particularly nonsensical.
Why would the Haydonites need to invent shielding to hide a power source they don't use, and which was developed LONG after their tiff with the Invid started? It's more likely that the Haydonites developed shadow fields for other purposes, or as protection against older Invid sensor technologies, and that its effectiveness against protoculture is something they either added to the technology to get humanity to adopt it or a happy accident as the result of its broad-spectrum blocking of EM emissions.
ShadowLogan wrote:No the RPG hasn't ruled it out specifically. They do state in the Main book that RDF/ASC mecha can be detected by PC sensors.
The main book also states that only protoculture-powered devices are detectable with those sensors, something corroborated in the New Generation book, which offers explicit confirmation that vehicles not powered by protoculture are not detectable... and the actual stats for those mecha indicate they do not use protoculture.
We bloody well know that's the result of Harmony Gold deciding this stuff ran on fusion after the core book was printed... still, that's down to the GM how to resolve that contradiction. Either follow the letter of the rules that only a protoculture-powered device or vehicle can be detected (meaning the early mecha are invisible) or apply the specific list and ignore the actual text of the rule and the specific examples in later books.
ShadowLogan wrote:All HG really has done is refuted the presence as a main power source (and ignoring other bits in canon in the process), not in any secondary role (FTS comic/gn, or even the show's PC-chips going into circuit boards).
But the RPG indicates that protoculture-based circuitry is NOT detectable... only protoculture power systems. In fact, even mutants who have protoculture-based mutations aren't detectable, per the RPG, unless they chug the contents of an entire vehicle-grade protoculture cell.
ShadowLogan wrote:I agree that the result is limited since some useful info is lacking, but it still can provide a low ball estimate since we have nothing better to work with.
It's not a lowball estimate, it's a wild guess based on a borderline-irrelevant figure... we can't compare the respective fuel efficiency and energy capacity if we don't know how much fuel they're carrying or how efficiently they're using that fuel...
ShadowLogan wrote:In a sense Veidt isn't lying to the UEEF though if the technology was "lost" from general knowledge, but something the Haydonites still knew about.
But if he provided it to Edwards, as Edwards' remarks indicate, then he IS lying because he's presenting it as something Edwards rediscovered independently... not as something the Haydonites cheerfully handed him.