Page 1 of 1

Re: armor of ithan question?

Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 2:02 pm
by Nekira Sudacne
sleekjag wrote:We use a house rule that if the damage to armor destroys the armor the act of destroying it stops with the armor then on the next turn damage can be done to the person. In a recent session the ley line walker cried about armor of ithan working that way since it's kind of like armor so i went ahead and agreed that rule applied to armor of ithan as well. It's a subjective question but how do you all feel about that ruling. Looking for opinions on that. Because now she just adds that to anyone she can and it might be becoming unbalanced and i know it's up to me as gm to decide on that but i wanted to hear what everyone else thought about it.


Armor of Ithan works that way. In fact it excplicity says it creates a noiseless, invisible suit of armor. but it IS a physical suit of armor.

Re: armor of ithan question?

Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 12:37 pm
by The Beast
If you're going to use the stupid GI Joe rule for one type of armor, then it must be fairly applied to all types of armor, be it technological, magical, psychic, or other.

Re: armor of ithan question?

Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2010 11:33 am
by Mouser13
I disagree only armor spell that should follow the armor rule is invincible armor since it says it does.