Page 1 of 1
Dual classing question
Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 1:23 pm
by thefirstromeo
Not sure if this was asked already, I'm sue it has been but I cant find the answer.
When character dual class, and the new OCC gives then another Hand to hand how does this work? would player now have said hand to hand at first level experience? or would it just replace the old hand to hand?
lets say player is 5th level with hand to hand basic, and now starts new class with hand to hand Expert, how would this work?
I cant see player having to use a first lvl hand to hand expert since he has 5th lvl Basic.
Re: Dual classing question
Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 1:48 pm
by Thinyser
Until the new one surpasses the old one in bonuses use the old higher bonuses. After you have better bonuses from the new one use those.
Re: Dual classing question
Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 8:30 pm
by drewkitty ~..~
Thinyser's explanation was a bit thin.
If they have the same h2h, then the h2h bonuses don't change till the class they changed to surpasses the level of the old class.
(as per rifts)If the new class has a different, greater, h2h, then they discard the old h2h and use the new h2h exclusively even though the bonuses might be less then the old h2h.
(as per ninja and superspies) If the h2h (MAF) is different from the old class' h2h, both h2h's are recorded separately and each can be used. The old h2h is frozen along with the skills of the old class. Each melee round you have to choose which h2h you are using that round.
Re: Dual classing question
Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:42 am
by Thinyser
Where in Rifts does it say that you have to use the new H2H exclusively (if it higher even though bonuses might be less)?
Re: Dual classing question
Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 8:08 am
by Anthar
It doesn't, she's house ruling it. Personally I'd just use the two different HTH the way they do in N&SS in that you must choose which HTH to use in a given round and use the bonuses exclusively from that HTH during that specific round. The rules do state somewhere that PCs cannot have more than one HTH but I don't think that they took into account the Dual Classing option and N&SS characters have a different flavor, so basically just houserule it.
Re: Dual classing question
Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 12:17 pm
by RogueSensei
If you just happen to pick up a second HTH because you are dual-classing, I'd say continue to use the old HTH until the new HTH surpasses the old one.
Think of it this way - you used to fight a certain way; you used your standard punches and kicks, nothing fancy. Well now you've got an expert HTH instructor who gives you some tips on more advanced techniques. It's going to take you a while to actually put these new techniques into practice, so when it comes to a real combat situation you're going to fall back to what you're comfortable with. Once you become more comfortable with your new training (ie. your level advances far enough that the bonuses are better than your old HTH) you can actually start using it in combat.
Now if you specifically went out and learned a new HTH, I'd probably treat that differently. But that's a different topic all together...
Re: Dual classing question
Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 6:33 pm
by drewkitty ~..~
Anthar wrote:It doesn't, he's house ruling it. Personally I'd just use the two different HTH the way they do in N&SS in that you must choose which HTH to use in a given round and use the bonuses exclusively from that HTH during that specific round. The rules do state somewhere that PCs cannot have more than one HTH but I don't think that they took into account the Dual Classing option and N&SS characters have a different flavor, so basically just houserule it.
I think I was thinking of the way that when a char has a single class and get a new 'higher' h2h, the new h2h replaces the old one totally.
She is right about the rule that a char, in rifts, can only have one h2h. But that rule does not take in account for the changing class rules.
A house rule might be more like, "If you use the h2h of your old class, you don't get any exp for the fight."
Re: Dual classing question
Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 6:56 pm
by Anthar
drewkitty ~..~ wrote:Anthar wrote:It doesn't, he's house ruling it. Personally I'd just use the two different HTH the way they do in N&SS in that you must choose which HTH to use in a given round and use the bonuses exclusively from that HTH during that specific round. The rules do state somewhere that PCs cannot have more than one HTH but I don't think that they took into account the Dual Classing option and N&SS characters have a different flavor, so basically just houserule it.
I think I was thinking of the way that when a char has a single class and get a new 'higher' h2h, the new h2h replaces the old one totally.
She is right about the rule that a char, in rifts, can only have one h2h. But that rule does not take in account for the changing class rules.
A house rule might be more like, "If you use the h2h of your old class, you don't get any exp for the fight."
"He" eh? I always thought that with your board name that you were a she, my mistake.
Re: Dual classing question
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:45 am
by Nekira Sudacne
The rules for Duel-Classing are found on palladium's Cutting room floor here:
http://www.palladium-megaverse.com/cutt ... alocc.html Characters that wish to learn a new O.C.C. must first advance at least one level in their current O.C.C./R.C.C. At second level (or wherever desired), they may opt for training in the new O.C.C. as SOON as they reach that new level (it cannot be done after they have advanced in their new experience level).
When the character begins their new training, they are zero-level in the new O.C.C. The character must earn experience points equal to the new O.C.C.'s second level (if Men of arms or adventurers) or third level (if magical or psychic). When that amount of experience points is acquired, the character has passed their apprenticeship and is now at first level in his new O.C.C.
Once characters change over to their new O.C.C., they retain their old skills (but frozen at the levels they achieved before the change) but all new PPE, S.D.C., and other increases will be based upon their new O.C.C. ALL new experience points are awarded to the new O.C.C.
As far as which hand to hand to use, according to the Ninja's and Superspys rule, if a player has multiple hand to hand styles, then he must declare which one he is using at the start of the melee round, but under no circumstances do they merge unless both specifically say they can mix (And there is only one pair that does).
Re: Dual classing question
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 4:53 pm
by drewkitty ~..~
The Published Rules for changing class are found in the high seas book.
The above is Just
posted (munchkin) ones.
Re: Dual classing question
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 9:22 pm
by Thinyser
drewkitty ~..~ wrote:The Published Rules for changing class are found in the high seas book.
The above is Just
posted (munchkin) ones.
High Seas is PFRPG and though it could apply to Rifts it doesn't state anything about the h2h.
Re: Dual classing question
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 11:48 pm
by drewkitty ~..~
The published changing class rules apply across the board like the megaversal spell creation and modification rules apply across the board, because they are the only ones Published.
Re: Dual classing question
Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 12:15 am
by Nekira Sudacne
drewkitty ~..~ wrote:The published changing class rules apply across the board like the megaversal spell creation and modification rules apply across the board, because they are the only ones Published.
Actually, the cutting room floor is
offical and are palladiums errata. they supersceed printed material, the Adventures on the High Seas rules are obsoleted by this.
Re: Dual classing question
Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 1:43 pm
by drewkitty ~..~
If they wanted to make the change they should of published them. Posted items are fungible so are thereby not available to be canon.
Re: Dual classing question
Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 7:48 pm
by Nekira Sudacne
drewkitty ~..~ wrote:If they wanted to make the change they should of published them. Posted items are fungible so are thereby not available to be canon.
Actually, what the company says is canon, is canon. I'm not sure why you think your personal preferences for format effect what the publishing company considers canon.
do you want all updates to be carved into stone tablets? is that non-fungible enough for you? not that being free as anything whatsoever to do with being offical, anyway.
Re: Dual classing question
Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 8:29 pm
by Thinyser
Have to agree with Nekira on this one which i seldom do...
The material on the cutting room floor is official Palladium errata despite its digital format and is therefore supersedes even printed canon.
That said its errata for PFRPG2 and (though i cannot see why) it could be handled entirely differently in Rifts. IMO the errata is the best cannon reference we have but neither mentions anything about h2h. If I had to rule on it H2H would be a "skill" and would be frozen but usable at its frozen level until surpassed by the new OCC's h2h.
It seems rather obvious that this is how it would be handled. You use what you know until what you are learning is better then you use that now that its better. This also explains why its harder to advance in the new OCC since you keep falling back to old habits that used to serve you well as a longbowman now have been delaying your advancement as a samurai...
Re: Dual classing question
Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 10:20 pm
by drewkitty ~..~
Nekira Sudacne wrote:drewkitty ~..~ wrote:If they wanted to make the change they should of published them. Posted items are fungible so are thereby not available to be canon.
Actually, what the company says is canon, is canon. I'm not sure why you think your personal preferences for format effect what the publishing company considers canon.
do you want all updates to be carved into stone tablets? is that non-fungible enough for you? not that being free as anything whatsoever to do with being offical, anyway.
not "stone", "in print"
Re: Dual classing question
Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 2:28 am
by Nekira Sudacne
drewkitty ~..~ wrote:Nekira Sudacne wrote:drewkitty ~..~ wrote:If they wanted to make the change they should of published them. Posted items are fungible so are thereby not available to be canon.
Actually, what the company says is canon, is canon. I'm not sure why you think your personal preferences for format effect what the publishing company considers canon.
do you want all updates to be carved into stone tablets? is that non-fungible enough for you? not that being free as anything whatsoever to do with being offical, anyway.
not "stone", "in print"
And how is being in print in any way relevent to it being offical?
Re: Dual classing question
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 5:26 pm
by drewkitty ~..~
Nekira Sudacne wrote:And how is being in print in any way relevant to it being official?
That is it published, and not just posted.
The last word in the unabridged webster's dictionary is zzz...
Re: Dual classing question
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:37 am
by Nekira Sudacne
drewkitty ~..~ wrote:Nekira Sudacne wrote:And how is being in print in any way relevant to it being official?
That is it published, and not just posted.
Again...how is that relevant?
Re: Dual classing question
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 3:16 am
by drewkitty ~..~
Not everyone has a computer is one of the things that make the published rules more canon than any posted stuff.
NS this is just one more thing we will have to disagree on.
Re: Dual classing question
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 12:11 pm
by Nekira Sudacne
drewkitty ~..~ wrote:Not everyone has a computer is one of the things that make the published rules more canon than any posted stuff.
NS this is just one more thing we will have to disagree on.
Except there really isn't room to agree to disagree on. Either the publisher says it's canon or not. You can refuse to accept it, but that's not really the same thing as agreeing to disagree.
Re: Dual classing question
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 12:44 pm
by Thinyser
Material is official if Palladium says its official, despite its "not printed on paper" status, PERIOD.
You cannot argue with this because it's Palladium's rule set and they tell us what is official... not us telling them.
Palladium could send out a press release email with new official rules if they felt like it and (though it would be retarded for them to do so) it would non the less be official if they said it was.
Re: Dual classing question
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:00 pm
by drewkitty ~..~
Like I said, we will have to agree to disagree.
Sub-text of "we will have to agree to disagree": let's stop beating at each other when we know each other's positions will not change.
Re: Dual classing question
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:15 pm
by Thinyser
lol sure but I'm gonna read that subtext as you saying your wrong but cannot admit it. OK?
Re: Dual classing question
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 5:08 pm
by Nekira Sudacne
drewkitty ~..~ wrote:Like I said, we will have to agree to disagree.
Sub-text of "we will have to agree to disagree": let's stop beating at each other when we know each other's positions will not change.
Well, if you want to do the virtual equlivent of jamming your fingers in your ears and screaming "La-La I can't hear you", I suppose I can't stop you.
Though just out of curiosity, why do you say the rules in the errata are broken compared to the adventures on the high seas? I've read them both and from what I recall they're almost identical.
Re: Dual classing question
Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 7:22 pm
by drewkitty ~..~
I'm not, as you put it, screaming "La-La I can't hear you". I was just saying that you are not going to change me in this 'so might as well stop trying'. The posted dual occ stuff if just too 'dumbed down for rifts' for a SDC sort of gamer that I am.
I just reread the posted dual occ stuff just to make sure they hadn't changed it. And it has not changed from what I read before.
The posted dual class stuff is like a primer compared to the published changing class rules. While they might be good for 'introducing' the idea of changing classes, it does not go into detail like the published changing class rules.
Re: Dual classing question
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 3:30 am
by Prysus
Greetings and Salutations. I do have a quick question. How do we know which was printed/posted first? Was Adventures on the High Seas, Second Edition printed before the Errata was posted? Or was the Errata posted before Adventures on the High Seas, Second Edition saw print? This could be a key piece of information in determining which one overwrites which one. While the Errata coming out after the PFRPG 2nd Edition Main Book, I don't know if it was posted before Adventures on the High Seas second edition. I could probably find out when Adventures on the High Seas 2nd Edition was released, but don't see any dates on the website. With all the latest product superceeds previous works I figured knowing which is actually first would be important. Thank you for your time and patience, please have a nice day. Farewell and safe journeys for now.
Re: Dual classing question
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 4:55 pm
by Thinyser
Prysus wrote:Greetings and Salutations. I do have a quick question. How do we know which was printed/posted first? Was Adventures on the High Seas, Second Edition printed before the Errata was posted? Or was the Errata posted before Adventures on the High Seas, Second Edition saw print? This could be a key piece of information in determining which one overwrites which one. While the Errata coming out after the PFRPG 2nd Edition Main Book, I don't know if it was posted before Adventures on the High Seas second edition. I could probably find out when Adventures on the High Seas 2nd Edition was released, but don't see any dates on the website. With all the latest product superceeds previous works I figured knowing which is actually first would be important. Thank you for your time and patience, please have a nice day. Farewell and safe journeys for now.
Well i cannot say when it was first put up on the interwebz but the copyright at the bottom of the cutting room floor says 2010 so it would seem that they have at least updated that this year.
Re: Dual classing question
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 6:08 pm
by drewkitty ~..~
Thinyser wrote:Well i cannot say when it was first put up on the interwebz but the copyright at the bottom of the cutting room floor says 2010 so it would seem that they have at least updated that this year.
Or PB just updates their signature that gets c&p'ed at the bottom of all their pages automatically. Which is the most likely way things get done.
Re: Dual classing question
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 8:22 pm
by Thinyser
drewkitty ~..~ wrote:Thinyser wrote:Well i cannot say when it was first put up on the interwebz but the copyright at the bottom of the cutting room floor says 2010 so it would seem that they have at least updated that this year.
Or PB just updates their signature that gets c&p'ed at the bottom of all their pages automatically. Which is the most likely way things get done.
That does seem pretty likely knowing how Palladium often C&P's with their books too
Still tho its the most recent copyright.
Feel free to ignore everything listed in the online errata for your games... but I still believe its canon material.
If it wasn't canon then most likely, since it is a "here today gone tomorrow" medium, Palladium wouldn't leave it there.
Re: Dual classing question
Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 2:19 am
by TechnoGothic
The rules in High Seas does go into more depth about Switching Classes.
The Errata is just a Quick and Dirty Dual/Switching class blurb to keep people from needing High Seas just for One Rule.
BOTH are OFFICAL.
Use whichever one suits you and your Group Best.
Its the Golden Rule of RPGs that matters most.
The Rules are a Guideline.
When Posting about RULES, always remember to mention the Source. If people wish to look it up and check. Good. If people rather use the Online Errata. Good for them.
As for Myself. I rather use what is actually Physical Printed in a Book. For me, if PB wants the Online Errata to be Offical (for my group) they will Print it in a Book. Then again I will ignore even those rules if they are Dumb (looking at you GIJoe rules). I still use the RMB over the new RUE for many reasons.
Re: Dual classing question
Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 12:15 pm
by Nekira Sudacne
TechnoGothic wrote:The rules in High Seas does go into more depth about Switching Classes.
The Errata is just a Quick and Dirty Dual/Switching class blurb to keep people from needing High Seas just for One Rule.
BOTH are OFFICAL.
Use whichever one suits you and your Group Best.
Its the Golden Rule of RPGs that matters most.
The Rules are a Guideline.
When Posting about RULES, always remember to mention the Source. If people wish to look it up and check. Good. If people rather use the Online Errata. Good for them.
As for Myself. I rather use what is actually Physical Printed in a Book. For me, if PB wants the Online Errata to be Offical (for my group) they will Print it in a Book. Then again I will ignore even those rules if they are Dumb (looking at you GIJoe rules). I still use the RMB over the new RUE for many reasons.
Everyone knows the golden rule, yes, that's why mentioning the golden rule is pointless. Sometimes, the GM /wants/ to use whats in the book. In which case, mentioning the golden rule isn't helpful.