hand to hand combat vs ranged modern weapon combat
Moderators: Immortals, Supreme Beings, Old Ones
-
Alrik Vas
- Knight
- Posts: 4810
- Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 8:20 pm
- Comment: Don't waste your time gloating over a wounded enemy. Pull the damn trigger.
- Location: Right behind you.
Re: hand to hand combat vs ranged modern weapon combat
Yes and yes.
Mark Hall wrote:Y'all seem to assume that Palladium books are written with the same exacting precision with which they are analyzed. I think that is... ambitious.
Talk from the Edge: Operation Dead Lift, Operation Reload, Operation Human Devil, Operation Handshake, Operation Windfall 1, Operation Windfall 2, Operation Sniper Wolf, Operation Natural 20
-
Tor
- Palladin
- Posts: 6975
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:37 pm
- Comment: If you have something to say, back it up with thoughts and reasons. Simply posting to agree or disagree tends to be a waste.
- Location: Pyramid
Re: hand to hand combat vs ranged modern weapon combat
I would only say no in cases where a separate rate of fire is given, but I only recall seeing that for ANCIENT ranged weapons (like the bunch in N&SS and Mystic China) oddly enough.
Even then it's not that consistent. Much like spellcasting, Palladium seems to flip-flop on whether it's based on HtH attacks or whether you have an entirely separate attack pool.
Even then it's not that consistent. Much like spellcasting, Palladium seems to flip-flop on whether it's based on HtH attacks or whether you have an entirely separate attack pool.
"1st edition? 2nd edition? It doesnt matter! Let's just talk" -Forums of the Megaverse