Page 1 of 1
Weapon Materials
Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 11:59 pm
by Killer Cyborg
I have a katana that's made of 440 Stainless Steel.
I don't know if that's a good thing or a bad thing.
It sounds good, but a comment in the Knight Vs. Samurai thread made me wonder.
For that matter, we have all sorts of alloys and materials now that we didn't have back when swords were actually used.
Would a titanium sword be any good? Or maybe for an axe or mace?
Or a depleted Uranium mace?
Or a plastic or fibreglass staff, cudgel, or maul?
Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 6:37 am
by Guest
Ironically, a while back I came across some articles that specifically addresses this:
http://swordforum.com/metallurgy/titanium.html
http://swordforum.com/swords/decorative ... dreal.html
The conclusion is interesting, it seems Titanium and 440 stainless steel are nice looking, but not very effective.
Depleted Uranium, while certainly denser than steel, and having more weight would be workable from just that standpoint, but don't forget that there is still slight radioactivity even with depleted Uranium.
As far as plastics and fiberglasses for blunt weapons, they would still work, but the lighter weight would tend to make them less effective.
Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 7:36 am
by Library Ogre
About what I was going to say. Most western, medieval, weapons rely on the weight of the weapon as much as the sharpness of the blade to do their damage. "Light but really sharp" might work for fencing weapons.
Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 7:57 am
by Guest
MrNexx wrote:About what I was going to say. Most western, medieval, weapons rely on the weight of the weapon as much as the sharpness of the blade to do their damage. "Light but really sharp" might work for fencing weapons.
Which brings up an interesting point about the myth of "blood grooves." I find it ironic that many proponents of this myth claim the reason for fullers is to prevent some sort of "vacuum suction" that would occur if the sword was thrust into the body. Yet it's ironic that fullers are found on swords designed for cutting, rather than swords designed for thrusting. It seems that the proponents have no explanation for why this is.
Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 11:03 am
by Jefffar
I'd think a depeleted uranum core inside a titanium or steel axe or mace (or even a long sward) would add incredibly to te impact of these weapons.
Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 11:35 am
by Guest
Jefffar wrote:I'd think a depeleted uranum core inside a titanium or steel axe or mace (or even a long sward) would add incredibly to te impact of these weapons.
True enough, and easily factored into game mechanics.
Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 12:59 pm
by Nekira Sudacne
Kuseru Satsujin wrote:Jefffar wrote:I'd think a depeleted uranum core inside a titanium or steel axe or mace (or even a long sward) would add incredibly to te impact of these weapons.
True enough, and easily factored into game mechanics.
"easily" by what standards? my head hurts just thinking about trying that.
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/help.gif)
Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 10:07 pm
by Library Ogre
Nekira Sudacne wrote:Kuseru Satsujin wrote:Jefffar wrote:I'd think a depeleted uranum core inside a titanium or steel axe or mace (or even a long sward) would add incredibly to te impact of these weapons.
True enough, and easily factored into game mechanics.
"easily" by what standards? my head hurts just thinking about trying that.
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/help.gif)
+2 to damage, +20 to SDC.
Easy.
![Wink ;-)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 8:28 am
by Guest
MrNexx wrote:Nekira Sudacne wrote:Kuseru Satsujin wrote:Jefffar wrote:I'd think a depeleted uranum core inside a titanium or steel axe or mace (or even a long sward) would add incredibly to te impact of these weapons.
True enough, and easily factored into game mechanics.
"easily" by what standards? my head hurts just thinking about trying that.
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/help.gif)
+2 to damage, +20 to SDC.
Easy.
![Wink ;-)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
Ironically, pretty much what I was thinking as well.
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 12:32 am
by Library Ogre
Kuseru Satsujin wrote:MrNexx wrote:Nekira Sudacne wrote:Kuseru Satsujin wrote:Jefffar wrote:I'd think a depeleted uranum core inside a titanium or steel axe or mace (or even a long sward) would add incredibly to te impact of these weapons.
True enough, and easily factored into game mechanics.
"easily" by what standards? my head hurts just thinking about trying that.
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/help.gif)
+2 to damage, +20 to SDC.
Easy.
![Wink ;-)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
Ironically, pretty much what I was thinking as well.
Great minds run in similar channels...
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 3:01 am
by Jefffar
Hopefully not the gutter
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 7:37 am
by Guest
Jefffar wrote:Hopefully not the gutter
No, if my mind gets that high, I might get a nosebleed.
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 10:40 am
by Library Ogre
Jefffar wrote:Hopefully not the gutter
My mind is so deep, it has to go through the gutter to get to where it's going.
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 8:52 pm
by Library Ogre
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 3:17 am
by Aramanthus
I have a carbon steel katana that was forged. It is not the damascus steel, but it does have some seriously wonderful balance to it. It flows with your arm movement as you swing it.